Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- facultystaff:phdregulations:qualifyingexam [2017/08/16 18:59] – [PHD.CSCI Regulation on the Qualifying Examination] jhughe13
+++ facultystaff:phdregulations:qualifyingexam [2017/08/18 14:19] (current) – [PHD.CSCI Regulation on the Qualifying Examination] jhughe13
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 **{{:facultystaff:phdregulations:phd_regulation_-_qualifying_examination.pdf|PHD.CSCI Regulation on the Qualifying Examination}}**
+{{:facultystaff:phdregulations:phd_qe_chair_report.txt|PhD QE Chair Report Template}}
 ==== Qualifying Exam ====
@@ Line 39: / Line 40: @@
 Failure of either component of the QE will constitute failing the entire QE. The QE Committee will assign either pass or fail to the Oral Component, and assign a separate pass or fail to the Written Component if the component is required. If the candidate receives a passing grade for all required components, they will receive a rating of satisfactory for the QE.
-If the candidate receives a failing grade on either required component, this will constitute a rating of unsatisfactory for the entire QE. In this case the QE Committee will determine if one or both of the Written and Oral components (which may require revision of the Proposal) must be retaken as per the rules of QE in the [[https://www.uoguelph.ca/registrar/calendars/graduate| Graduate Calendar]].
+If the candidate receives a failing grade on either required component, this will constitute a rating of unsatisfactory for the entire QE. In this case the QE Committee will determine if one or both of the Written and Oral components (which may require revision of the Proposal) must be retaken as per the rules of QE in the ([[https://www.uoguelph.ca/registrar/calendars/graduate/2017-2018/degreg/degreg-phd-qualexam.shtml | Graduate Calendar]]).